<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Rob@Rojotek</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rojotek.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rojotek.com/blog</link>
	<description>Software Development in Brisbane</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Memory Settings for Eclipse on OSX by Daniel Smedegaard Buus</title>
		<link>http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2008/05/13/memory-settings-for-eclipse-on-osx/comment-page-1/#comment-83478</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Smedegaard Buus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 10:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2008/05/13/memory-settings-for-eclipse-on-osx/#comment-83478</guid>
		<description>Hi :)

Just wanted to add that you don&#039;t have to edit the local Eclipse configuration files to change Java&#039;s VM memory restrictions.

You can export the Java options you want to be global in your ~/.bashrc file, and they&#039;ll apply to all Java apps. In my .bashrc, I have

&lt;code&gt;export _JAVA_OPTIONS=&#039;-Xms40m -Xmx1024m&#039;&lt;/code&gt;

The good thing about this is that it sticks even if I uninstall or upgrade Eclipse.

Bad thing, it applies to every Java app I run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi <img src='http://www.rojotek.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Just wanted to add that you don&#8217;t have to edit the local Eclipse configuration files to change Java&#8217;s VM memory restrictions.</p>
<p>You can export the Java options you want to be global in your ~/.bashrc file, and they&#8217;ll apply to all Java apps. In my .bashrc, I have</p>
<div class="codecolorer-container text default" style="overflow:auto;white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #9F9F9F;width:435px;"><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"><tbody><tr><td style="padding:5px;text-align:center;color:#888888;background-color:#EEEEEE;border-right: 1px solid #9F9F9F;font: normal 12px/1.4em Monaco, Lucida Console, monospace;"><div>1<br /></div></td><td><div class="text codecolorer" style="padding:5px;font:normal 12px/1.4em Monaco, Lucida Console, monospace;white-space:nowrap">export _JAVA_OPTIONS='-Xms40m -Xmx1024m'</div></td></tr></tbody></table></div>
<p>The good thing about this is that it sticks even if I uninstall or upgrade Eclipse.</p>
<p>Bad thing, it applies to every Java app I run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making the Home and End Keys work in Eclipse 3.4 on Apple Mac OSX by Neal</title>
		<link>http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2009/06/12/making-the-home-and-end-keys-work-in-eclipse-34-on-apple-mac-osx/comment-page-1/#comment-83397</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rojotek.com/blog/?p=897#comment-83397</guid>
		<description>This was exactly what I needed to prevent a computer throwing incident.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was exactly what I needed to prevent a computer throwing incident.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HTTP Authentication in a URL by Declercq</title>
		<link>http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2008/05/19/http-authentication-in-a-url/comment-page-1/#comment-81610</link>
		<dc:creator>Declercq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2008/05/19/http-authentication-in-a-url/#comment-81610</guid>
		<description>Hello ;

Usage of Basic authentication via URL is not really intented for real user but more for automation. If your are using an application that use its own HTTP client to make some requests on remote servers, you will be happy to be able to pass authentication data via URL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello ;</p>
<p>Usage of Basic authentication via URL is not really intented for real user but more for automation. If your are using an application that use its own HTTP client to make some requests on remote servers, you will be happy to be able to pass authentication data via URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing Beautiful RSpec Matchers by Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2012/09/04/writing-beautiful-rspec-matchers/comment-page-1/#comment-81454</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rojotek.com/blog/?p=1147#comment-81454</guid>
		<description>Thanks much appreciated your blog. It&#039;s good to see how other people are writing custom matchers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks much appreciated your blog. It&#8217;s good to see how other people are writing custom matchers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Manually Removing Items From the OSX Finder Sidebar by Butch M.</title>
		<link>http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2007/06/23/manually-removing-items-from-the-osx-finder-sidebar/comment-page-2/#comment-81428</link>
		<dc:creator>Butch M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2007/06/23/manually-removing-items-from-the-osx-finder-sidebar/#comment-81428</guid>
		<description>Who&#039;d of thunk?  COMMAND KEY?!?!?!?

I&#039;ve had the icons for two previously burned DVD images stuck on my favorites list for MONTHS!!!  I am soooo glad to have run into this thread.

Thank you very, very much!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who&#8217;d of thunk?  COMMAND KEY?!?!?!?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had the icons for two previously burned DVD images stuck on my favorites list for MONTHS!!!  I am soooo glad to have run into this thread.</p>
<p>Thank you very, very much!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making the Home and End Keys work in Eclipse 3.4 on Apple Mac OSX by kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2009/06/12/making-the-home-and-end-keys-work-in-eclipse-34-on-apple-mac-osx/comment-page-1/#comment-81408</link>
		<dc:creator>kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rojotek.com/blog/?p=897#comment-81408</guid>
		<description>In the middle of a 1000 line file I hit home to go to the beginning of the lin, only to go to the start of the file. WTF. Thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the middle of a 1000 line file I hit home to go to the beginning of the lin, only to go to the start of the file. WTF. Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing Beautiful RSpec Matchers by Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2012/09/04/writing-beautiful-rspec-matchers/comment-page-1/#comment-80603</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 13:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rojotek.com/blog/?p=1147#comment-80603</guid>
		<description>@Damien - yeah -- they aren&#039;t perfect -- but they do give a good direction for what rspec matchers can look like -- With the simplicity of writing matchers, it&#039;s easy to make others that really do what you want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Damien &#8211; yeah &#8212; they aren&#8217;t perfect &#8212; but they do give a good direction for what rspec matchers can look like &#8212; With the simplicity of writing matchers, it&#8217;s easy to make others that really do what you want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Options for getting JRuby 1.6 to use Ruby 1.9 Syntax by jacob</title>
		<link>http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2012/09/10/options-for-getting-jruby-1-6-to-use-ruby-1-9-syntax/comment-page-1/#comment-80588</link>
		<dc:creator>jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 22:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rojotek.com/blog/?p=1152#comment-80588</guid>
		<description>&quot;export RUBYOPT=&quot;--1.9&quot;&quot; is quite horrible you&#039;re right and slightly annoying to find.

Hopefully most developers are using bundler to control their gem dependencies, and luckily, bundler now supports the feature of blowing up if the ruby environment isn&#039;t set correctly.

http://gembundler.com/v1.2/gemfile_ruby.html

Hopefully this solves a few issues that creep in when having shared environments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;export RUBYOPT=&#8221;&#8211;1.9&#8243;&#8221; is quite horrible you&#8217;re right and slightly annoying to find.</p>
<p>Hopefully most developers are using bundler to control their gem dependencies, and luckily, bundler now supports the feature of blowing up if the ruby environment isn&#8217;t set correctly.</p>
<p><a href="http://gembundler.com/v1.2/gemfile_ruby.html" rel="nofollow">http://gembundler.com/v1.2/gemfile_ruby.html</a></p>
<p>Hopefully this solves a few issues that creep in when having shared environments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing Beautiful RSpec Matchers by Damien</title>
		<link>http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2012/09/04/writing-beautiful-rspec-matchers/comment-page-1/#comment-80575</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 13:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rojotek.com/blog/?p=1147#comment-80575</guid>
		<description>The shoulda-matchers are indeed nice. They have a big flaw though, they make you test things you shouldn&#039;t necessarily be testing (the &quot;have_db_column&quot; for example).

And some of them are quite slow and require data generation *before* the matcher, like validates_uniqueness_of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shoulda-matchers are indeed nice. They have a big flaw though, they make you test things you shouldn&#8217;t necessarily be testing (the &#8220;have_db_column&#8221; for example).</p>
<p>And some of them are quite slow and require data generation *before* the matcher, like validates_uniqueness_of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing Beautiful RSpec Matchers by Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2012/09/04/writing-beautiful-rspec-matchers/comment-page-1/#comment-80490</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 07:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rojotek.com/blog/?p=1147#comment-80490</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that awesome feedback Michael.  It&#039;s great to hear positive comments like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that awesome feedback Michael.  It&#8217;s great to hear positive comments like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
