Comments on: Clover coverage results http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2003/07/16/clover-coverage-results/ Software Development in Brisbane Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:00:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3 By: Philippe http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2003/07/16/clover-coverage-results/comment-page-1/#comment-23 Philippe Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-23 Good point but in a way maybe this is pointing out that the test is inappropriate ? Should you really be testing the JVM capabilities in a unit-test (I am assuming this is what you are doing)? Isn't it a test for the QA department or for a preproduction environement. Are you sure that your tests will be running in the same JVM as the production env ? If not then the test is meaningless, if so then you already know what the JVM is capable of. Just my 2 cents (I ran into similar problems related to unix locales some time ago !) Good point but in a way maybe this is pointing out that the test is inappropriate ?
Should you really be testing the JVM capabilities in a unit-test (I am assuming this is what you are doing)? Isn’t it a test for the QA department or for a preproduction environement.

Are you sure that your tests will be running in the same JVM as the production env ? If not then the test is meaningless, if so then you already know what the JVM is capable of.

Just my 2 cents (I ran into similar problems related to unix locales some time ago !)

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.rojotek.com/blog/2003/07/16/clover-coverage-results/comment-page-1/#comment-24 Anonymous Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 #comment-24 I think you can get Clover to ignore catch statements. I've had the same problem. Virtually my only complaint about Clover, it's a great tool! I think you can get Clover to ignore catch statements. I’ve had the same problem. Virtually my only complaint about Clover, it’s a great tool!

]]>